January 28, 2026
Traditional expert networks have dominated primary research for decades, but in 2026, companies are building their own research assets instead of renting access. This guide explores how the research landscape has evolved, why owning your network delivers superior ROI, and practical steps to transition from expert brokers to self-directed research infrastructure.
Articles

If your team regularly conducts primary research, you've likely faced a persistent challenge: the high costs and dependencies created by traditional expert networks. While firms like GLG and AlphaSights have dominated the landscape for decades, 2026 marks a turning point where forward-thinking teams are replacing these middlemen with their own research infrastructure.
Traditional expert networks operate on a simple premise: they own access to experts and rent it back to you at a premium. This model made sense in an era when building your own network was prohibitively difficult. But the research ecosystem of 2026 looks dramatically different.
What's changed?
According to McKinsey's 2025 Insight Economy Report, companies now spend 40% more on primary research than they did five years ago, but many are questioning whether the traditional broker model delivers adequate ROI.
When you work with traditional expert networks, you're not just paying for expert time. You're paying for:
"Companies that rely exclusively on brokered expert access are essentially renting insights rather than building research assets," notes Harvard Business Review's 2025 analysis of corporate research functions.
The new paradigm focuses on building rather than renting. Here's why this approach delivers better results:
By eliminating the broker layer, companies typically reduce per-interview costs by 30-60%. For teams conducting ongoing research, these savings compound significantly over time.
Direct outreach to precisely targeted experts often results in faster recruitment, especially for niche or specialized topics. According to Forrester's 2026 Primary Research Benchmark, companies with owned research networks complete projects 42% faster than those relying solely on traditional expert networks.
When you recruit directly through your own channels, you maintain the connections you create. This enables:
Owned research infrastructure integrates more seamlessly with modern research tools, from AI transcription to insight synthesis platforms, creating a more cohesive research technology stack.
The foundation of an owned research network is efficient outreach capability. Modern platforms allow teams to:
"The first mistake companies make is treating LinkedIn as just a social network rather than their most powerful research recruitment tool," explains the founder of a leading research operations consultancy.
Modern scheduling infrastructure eliminates the back-and-forth that traditionally consumed research operations time:
The value of research lies in what you capture and how you leverage it:
The most successful research functions in 2026 aren't completely abandoning expert networks. Instead, they're developing a hybrid approach:
"The future isn't about eliminating expert networks entirely," notes Gartner's VP of Research Innovation. "It's about strategically deciding when to rent access and when to build it."
To effectively replace expert networks, you'll need:
Successful transitions typically involve:
Track these metrics to demonstrate the value of your transition:
As we move through 2026 and beyond, the distinction between companies that own their research networks and those that rent access will become increasingly apparent. The former will enjoy faster insights, lower costs, and a growing research asset that delivers competitive advantage.
While traditional expert networks won't disappear, their role is evolving from being the default research solution to being one specialized tool in a modern research technology stack.
As markets continue to evolve at an accelerating pace, the ability to quickly gather expert insights will remain a critical competitive advantage. The question is no longer whether your team needs primary research, but whether you're building a lasting research asset or simply renting temporary access.