January 28, 2026
Traditional expert networks rent access to specialists at premium rates, while research platforms provide tools to build and manage your own network. Understand the key differences in cost structure, relationship ownership, and long-term value to determine which approach best serves your organization's research needs.
Articles

When organizations need specialized knowledge or market insights, they typically turn to one of two solutions: expert networks or research platforms. While both aim to connect you with subject matter experts, their fundamental approaches differ significantly. Understanding these differences can help you make more strategic decisions about how you gather primary research and build knowledge assets for your organization.
Traditional expert networks like GLG (Gerson Lehrman Group), AlphaSights, and Third Bridge operate on a broker model. They maintain extensive databases of subject matter experts across industries and disciplines. When you need insights, they:
For this service, you pay hourly rates that typically range from $300 to $1,500 per hour of expert time, with the network taking a substantial cut as their broker fee.
Traditional expert networks offer:
However, this model comes with significant drawbacks:
According to a 2022 survey by Primary Research Group, organizations using traditional expert networks reported spending an average of $150,000 annually on these services, with some enterprise users exceeding $1 million in annual spend.
Research platforms take a fundamentally different approach. Rather than selling you access to their network, they provide technology and tools to build and manage your own expert network. Platforms like 28Experts enable you to:
Research platforms offer distinct advantages:
The platform approach requires:
Expert Networks: High per-hour costs that include significant markup for access to the network.
Research Platforms: Platform subscription plus lower per-interview costs, with no markup for network access.
According to research from Integrity Research Associates, organizations using research platforms rather than traditional expert networks report cost savings of 40-60% for comparable expert access.
Expert Networks: The network owns the relationships. If you want to speak with an expert again, you go through the network and pay again.
Research Platforms: Your organization owns the relationships. Experts become part of your extended professional network.
Expert Networks: Pool-first approach that works best when the experts you need are already in their database.
Research Platforms: Target-first approach that allows you to define exactly who you want to reach, then go find them.
Expert Networks: Transactional value. Each engagement stands alone.
Research Platforms: Cumulative value. Each project builds your organizational network and research capability.
Expert Networks: Typically offer limited tools for knowledge capture and sharing.
Research Platforms: Often include features for recording, transcribing, analyzing, and sharing insights across your organization.
Many sophisticated organizations are now adopting a hybrid strategy:
This approach combines the cost efficiency and network-building benefits of platforms with the immediate access of traditional networks when needed.
If you're currently using traditional expert networks exclusively, consider these steps toward a platform approach:
The choice between expert networks and research platforms ultimately comes down to how you view research within your organization: as a series of transactions or as a capability you want to own.
Traditional expert networks offer convenience and immediate access at a premium price point. Research platforms require more involvement but deliver greater long-term value and cost efficiency while helping you build your own research network asset.
As markets move faster and budgets tighten, more organizations are recognizing that owning their research network—rather than renting access—creates both immediate cost savings and lasting strategic advantage. By understanding the fundamental differences between these models, you can make more informed decisions about how to structure your organization's approach to expert access and knowledge acquisition.